Two tournament tools, one practical question
A calm way to compare the workflow rather than relying on a feature checklist. Check both products' current plans and terms before choosing.
| Question | Tournify | Trophy |
|---|---|---|
| Best starting point | Designed around a club organiser, a join code and the physical pitches or courts in front of them. | A broad tournament workspace with its own planning and event workflows. |
| Format language | Football age groups, padel Americano and simple live singles are first-class starting points. | Supports a wide range of tournament formats. Exact availability depends on the current plan. |
| Score confidence | Two-sided confirmation, immutable result versions and an organiser decision when scores differ. | Compare the current scoring, correction and audit workflow for the event you run. |
| Public results | A readable public board and a clubhouse TV view are part of the event shape. | Compare the public results and display options that match your audience. |
| Pricing shape | Free to start, one tournament or a Weekender on us while the beta runs, or £120 for a club year. | Check the current published price, limits and currency before buying. |
Our view
Make the comparison on the day you actually run.
The right choice is the one that leaves the organiser with fewer moving parts on the day. Try the same event in both workflows and compare the plan, score correction and public board.
See Trophy in action